Recently, I encountered a machine check error on a AMD motherboard running 2 x dual-core processors making it 4 CPUs and 16 GB RAM. Operating system running is Windows Server 2003 R2 SP 1. The machine is very powerful and performance issue is definitely out of the question. Software causing the machine check error is a .NET application compiled in x64 configuration platform.
A trial and error concludes that x64 could be causing some problems to the set of codes I wrote. BTW, the .NET application is just a small application doing duplex serial communication via RS-232 serial ports. A change from x64 to x86 compilation seems to work miraculously. After further searching on the internet, I attempted to install the latest Service Pack. The problem seems to have gone away even with a x64 compilation.
A machine check error may occur without any noticeable symptoms in Windows Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/835768
How to disable the corrected machine check on a Microsoft Windows Server 2003-based computer
It's an ugly method to disable machine check error prompt and I strongly against using it.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912310
Computer, Technology, Databases, Google, Internet, Mobile, Linux, Microsoft, Open Source, Security, Social Media, Web Development, Business, Finance
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
新加坡人口400万,亚洲人口4亿,全世界人口6亿。 但是,我一人可能就很有可能是世界最傻的了。我真是个不折不扣的大木头。真是受不了自己。
-
On 25 Mar 2008, I received a malicious email claiming to be from Singnet . That email attempts to trick someone into replying with their Sin...
-
For anyone living in or visiting Singapore, mastering the public transport system is a rite of passage. While the MRT is efficient, the exte...
-
I recently wrote a code snippet to fill arrays with a value. The below method is a generic method that will accept different data types. Hop...
-
*********** Try to sleep now, close your eyes Soon the birds would stop singing Twinkling stars, are shining bright They'll be watch...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Do provide your constructive comment. I appreciate that.