This is an interesting discussion on poor return to policyholder and the company in picture is "PXXXXXXXXX". I would say commission is needed for advisers as this their source of income. However, wouldn't it have been better if the cost is paid to an IFA who provides services in comparing the various products in the market and recommends the best ones? We should be gunning for service based and not product based.
http://tankinlian.blogspot.com/2007/11/poor-return-to-policyholder.html
Computer, Technology, Databases, Google, Internet, Mobile, Linux, Microsoft, Open Source, Security, Social Media, Web Development, Business, Finance
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Google url shortener service, goo.gl , is now much improved with newly included features like easier copy and paste, and ability to delete e...
-
I would like to apologize that sigining of my guestbook is not possible at the moment due to an unexpected bug. There is already 74 entries ...
-
The Google Adsense made a blog post with a video to help us understand the concept behind eCPM (Effective Cost Per Thousand Impressions). ...
-
*********** Try to sleep now, close your eyes Soon the birds would stop singing Twinkling stars, are shining bright They'll be watch...
-
An efficient method to find out the total record counts of all tables in an Oracle database. select table_name, to_number(extractvalue(xm...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Do provide your constructive comment. I appreciate that.