Is National Environment Agency (NEA) efficient? I shall leave this question to be answered by yourself.
On 22 Feb 2008, NEA made a post on Today papers titled "Book thrown at puffers". Basically, NEA is replying to an earlier post. The earlier post made revealed signs of smoking activity in bus stops after spotting cigarette butts in litter bins' ash trays.
From NEA's reply, a total of 994 offenders caught smoking were caught in the year of 2007. On January 2008 itself, a total of 84 were caught. This statistics left me scratching my head. Taking year 2007 data of 994, it means an average of 83 were caught per month and a mere average of 3 were caught in a single day. These numbers are close to January 2008's. I shall assume this statistics to remain consistent judging from historical records. To make things look less "ugly", I shall assume a team of only 3 NEA officers are being deployed everyday. Weekends and public holidays are included since smokers "work" everyday. This will imply each officer manages to catch only 1 offender per day.
Does this make sense? This statistics certainly does not look logical to me.
So is NEA efficient?
Computer, Technology, Databases, Google, Internet, Mobile, Linux, Microsoft, Open Source, Security, Social Media, Web Development, Business, Finance
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
新加坡人口400万,亚洲人口4亿,全世界人口6亿。 但是,我一人可能就很有可能是世界最傻的了。我真是个不折不扣的大木头。真是受不了自己。
-
If you are working with PowerShell and need a fast way to list all files in a directory, including those buried in subfolders, this one-line...
-
I was at Bugis Junction today and saw 蘇打綠 (Soda Green) performing. They look so much different especially the lead singer. I find their song...
-
*********** Try to sleep now, close your eyes Soon the birds would stop singing Twinkling stars, are shining bright They'll be watch...
-
I would like to apologize that sigining of my guestbook is not possible at the moment due to an unexpected bug. There is already 74 entries ...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Do provide your constructive comment. I appreciate that.